This sounds like a story that has a place in Chicago. You know, where the maxim is to “vote early and vote often.” obviously, nobody ought to recommend that Chicago is the sole area of political corruption as it’s all around. It’s quite recently that Chicago has to some degree set the standard for vote altering and voter fraud.
In any case, this time we are dealing Philadelphia. What’s more, what has been revealed there isn’t great. We have Chicago-style elections in the City of Brotherly Love.
Four Democratic survey specialists have been accused of various offenses including voter intimidation. This does nothing to empower investment in decisions as voters reason that “it’s all rigged anyway.” While it’s not at all like that their activities modified the outcome, such offenses are an immediate attack on our type of government. Thus, it’s not kidding.
“Four members of an election board were charged Monday with intimidating voters, casting bogus ballots, and falsely certifying the results in their polling place during a March 21 special election for the state House’s 197th District.
“Those charged include Dolores Shaw, 61; Calvin Mattox, 52; Thurman George, 57; and Wallace Hill, 60. The four — all Democrats — manned the ballot machines at the Esperanza Health Center at Kensington and Allegheny Avenues in the 43rd Ward, one of the polling places where complaints about illegal electioneering were lodged.”
Those were some extremely bustling survey specialists. Given that their charged violations were “necessary” to change the outcomes, the entire thing was an extremely doltish waste of exertion notwithstanding being criminal. Furthermore, it doubts the insight of the individuals who purportedly dedicated these acts.
Here are a few the offenses for which individuals from this group have been charged.
“One elderly couple, both Republicans, cast their ballots together, but only one of the votes was recorded, while the other appeared to have been replaced with a write-in vote for the Democrat in the race, Shapiro said.
“A voter intending to cast a ballot for the Green Party candidate was told the ballot machine was broken and later was cursed at when he returned to try again, Shapiro said. Another voter supporting the Green Party candidate was aggressively questioned when he tried to bring someone into the polling booth to assist him, as allowed by law.”
As pointed out, the consequence of this election, even without fraud, was never in question. “Emilio Vazquez, the Democratic leader of the 43rd Ward, easily won the special election despite having to run a write-in campaign. He was sworn into office April 5 and will have to seek reelection to a full two-year term next year. He declined to comment Monday.”
The Philadelphia District Attorney has it right.
“Philadelphia District Attorney Kelley Hodge on Monday called the election board actions ‘a ruthless example of why so many of our fellow citizens are skeptical and distrustful of our elections.’”
No one wins when an election is decided by fraud. While it gives the idea that the election fraud in this poll did not change the outcome, the point stays self-evident. Individuals don’t prefer to partake in exploitative challenges where they are being played for fools.
This is an extraordinary time to influence a case to out of the individuals who might debase our decisions. This was a moderately darken ballot ought not to prevent the indictment. Truth be told, this ought to be viewed as a preemptive strike against the kind of thing that must be ceased before state and national races are held.
What do you think about this? Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comment section below.
Thank you for reading.